Rentoul: Rayner Will Have to Come Clean Eventually

John Rentoul writes…

“Of course, Rayner should explain in more detail why she was not liable for tax on the sale of her house. It may be, for example, that, having nominated her house as her primary residence, as she was entitled to do, her former husband was liable for tax on the sale of his house – as a married couple may nominate only one… She will have to come clean eventually, because this is the sort of story that could catch fire in an election campaign, however unfair it may seem to her.”[…] Read the rest