‘Romania under tyranny’: How EU-sceptic Calin Georgescu got barred from new elections

The Central Electoral Bureau has prohibited the politician from standing for the May presidential vote over his “anti-democratic” views

Romania’s Central Electoral Bureau (BEC) has blocked Calin Georgescu’s bid to participate in the May presidential election. The right-wing, anti-establishment candidate’s surprise victory in the first round of the November vote had triggered a rerun.

The electoral authorities in Bucharest cited the outspoken politician’s supposed failure to “comply with the rules of the electoral procedure, violating the very obligation… to defend democracy.” BEC had previously received more than 1,000 complaints against Georgescu regarding his “extremist” views.

The ruling can be appealed to the Constitutional Court within 24 hours.

Georgescu's reaction 

The presidential hopeful, who was a clear favorite in the upcoming election and projected to garner up to 45% of the vote, wrote on X that the decision constitutes a “direct blow to the heart of democracy worldwide.” Georgescu claimed that “Europe is now a dictatorship [and] Romania is under tyranny.”

Background and views 

The politician has a doctorate in soil science and spent much of the 1990’s and 2000’s in Romania’s environmental ministry. He represented the country on the national committee of the United Nations Environment Program until 2012.

For some time, Georgescu was a member of the right-wing Alliance for the Unity of Romanians (AUR), but he left the party in 2022 amid internal feuds. While not associated with any party since then, he has managed to create a relatively successful online persona on several social media platforms in recent years.

Georgescu has repeatedly lambasted NATO and the EU, both of which Romania is a member of, and denounced Western support for Ukraine, among other things.

Roots of controversy 

Against all major pollsters’ projections, the right-wing politician scored a surprise win in the first round of the country’s presidential election in November with 23% of the vote. However, the following month, Romania’s Constitutional Court annulled the results, citing intelligence documents alleging “irregularities” in the campaign and supposed Russian interference. However, no proof for those allegations has been forthcoming.

Subsequent media reports, citing the preliminary findings of an investigation into the matter, indicated that the alleged “irregularities” stemmed from the activities of a consulting firm linked to the ruling pro-Western National Liberal Party. It was apparently trying to undermine another candidate, and had inadvertently boosted Georgescu in the process.

Russia's response to allegations 

Commenting on the claims of Russian meddling, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov insisted in late November that “we are not in the habit of interfering in elections in other countries, particularly in Romania, and we do not intend to do so now.” The official chalked the allegations up to what he described as a “basic trend that exists in the West in this regard.”

Read more

Georgescu to appeal Romanian presidential election ban – Reuters

Georgescu charged 

In late February, Georgescu was briefly detained and indicted on six criminal charges, including alleged “anti-constitutional acts,” “voter bribery,” and “promoting fascist, racist, or xenophobic ideologies.”

The Romanian politician asked US President Donald Trump to “take care about the situation,” claiming that he had fallen victim to the “deep state” in his country.

US criticism

While the US head of state has yet to publicly comment on the controversy, US Vice President J.D. Vance spoke at the Munich Security Conference last month of “ugly, Soviet-era” practices rearing their ugly head in Romania in a bid to stifle an “alternative viewpoint.”
Trump-appointed government efficiency tsar Elon Musk later in February characterized Georgescu’s arrest as being “messed up.”

Experts' take 

In an article on Sunday, Romania’s Adevarul media outlet quoted a former constitutional judge as stating that under the country’s laws, “invalidation of the candidacy is justified only in the case of a [candidate’s] final conviction” of a crime.

Commenting on BEC’s decision to bar Georgescu from running for president, constitutional law expert Bogdan Iancu told the media outlet that Romania’s Constitutional Court would have to heed an urgent report issued in late January by the Venice Commission, officially known as the European Commission for Democracy through Law. In it, the advisory body within the Council of Europe wrote that the “cancellation of a part of elections or elections as a whole is justified only under very exceptional circumstances.” It further noted that any cancellation of election results on account of online campaign irregularities “should precisely indicate the violations and the evidence, and they must not be based solely on classified intelligence… as this would not guarantee the necessary transparency and verifiability.”

The report also referenced the Venice Commission’s Code of Good Practice from 2018, according to which, “deprivation of the right to vote and to be elected… must be based on mental incapacity or a criminal conviction for a serious offence.”

Arguments against Georgescu 

Proponents of Georgescu’s elimination from the upcoming election have in turn cited last year’s precedent where the Constitutional Court barred another right-wing candidate, Diana Sosoaca, from running for president, after analyzing her conduct and public statements and their implications.